DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Volvo V60 vs 2012 Mazda 5 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 5

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo V60SpecificationMazda 5
VolvoMakeMazda
V60Model5
2012Model year2012
EstateBody typeMinivan
5Seats7
5Doors5

Performance

Volvo V60SpecificationMazda 5
10,4 s0–100 km/h11,2 s
0 km/hTop speed193 km/h
1596 ccEngine displacement1999 cc
150 HPPower150 HP
240 NmTorque191 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo V60SpecificationMazda 5
PetrolFuel typePetrol
67 ltFuel tank60 lt
9,9 ltUrban consumption9,0 lt
5,9 ltExtra-urban consumption5,7 lt
7,4 ltAverage consumption6,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo V60SpecificationMazda 5
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size205/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo V60SpecificationMazda 5
4628 mmLength4585 mm
1865 mmWidth1750 mm
1484 mmHeight1615 mm
1537 KgWeight1410 Kg
2776 mmWheelbase2750 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Volvo V60 and 2012 Mazda 5 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 5 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…