DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2011 Volvo V60 vs 2011 Proton Exora Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Proton Exora

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeProton
V60ModelExora
2011Model year2011
EstateBody typeMPV
5Seats7
5Doors5

Performance

10,4 s0–100 km/h11,3 s
0 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1596 ccEngine displacement1597 cc
150 HPPower140 HP
240 NmTorque205 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
67 ltFuel tank55 lt
9,9 ltUrban consumption—
5,9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,4 ltAverage consumption7,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6GearsCVT
—Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4628 mmLength4592 mm
1865 mmWidth1809 mm
1484 mmHeight1691 mm
1537 KgWeight1455 Kg
2776 mmWheelbase2730 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2011 Volvo V60 and 2011 Proton Exora approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Proton Exora leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…