DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Volvo V60 vs 2012 Citroen C3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Citroen C3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo V60SpecificationCitroen C3
VolvoMakeCitroen
V60ModelC3
2012Model year2012
EstateBody typeKombi, MPV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Volvo V60SpecificationCitroen C3
12,7 s0–100 km/h12,1 s
0 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1560 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
115 HPPower115 HP
270 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo V60SpecificationCitroen C3
DieselFuel typePetrol
67 ltFuel tank50 lt
5,1 ltUrban consumption9 lt
4,2 ltExtra-urban consumption4,9 lt
4,5 ltAverage consumption6,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo V60SpecificationCitroen C3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
—Tyre size195/55 R16; 205/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo V60SpecificationCitroen C3
4628 mmLength4078 mm
1865 mmWidth1766 mm
1484 mmHeight1669-1672 mm
1535 KgWeight1290 Kg
2776 mmWheelbase2540 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Volvo V60 and 2012 Citroen C3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Citroen C3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…