2006 • Volvo
V50
Volvo V50 2.5 20V T5 (220 Hp) 2006Overall Score73.75/100
2006 Volvo V50 vs 2006 Cadillac CTS Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2006 • Cadillac
CTS
Cadillac CTS 2.6i V6 24V L (181 Hp) 2006Overall Score73.5/100
WINNER
Volvo V50
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
73.75–73.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo V50SpecificationCadillac CTS
VolvoMakeCadillac
V50ModelCTS
2006Model year2006
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Volvo V50SpecificationCadillac CTS
6,9 s0–100 km/h9,3 s
240 km/hTop speed223 km/h
2521 ccEngine displacement2597 cc
220 HPPower181 HP
320 NmTorque245 Nm
5Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo V50SpecificationCadillac CTS
PetrolFuel typePetrol
62 ltFuel tank66 lt
—Urban consumption13,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,2 lt
8,8 ltAverage consumption10,2 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Volvo V50SpecificationCadillac CTS
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears5
—Tyre size225/55 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volvo V50SpecificationCadillac CTS
4514 mmLength4828 mm
1770 mmWidth1795 mm
1452 mmHeight1441 mm
—Weight1625 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2880 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2006 Volvo V50 and 2006 Cadillac CTS approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volvo V50 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…