2009 • Volvo
V50
Volvo V50 2.4i (170 Hp) 2009Overall Score62.5/100
2009 Volvo V50 vs 2009 Citroen C-Crosser Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2009 • Citroen
C-Crosser
Citroen C-Crosser 2.4i 16V (170) 2009Overall Score63.25/100
WINNER
Citroen C-Crosser
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo V50SpecificationCitroen C-Crosser
VolvoMakeCitroen
V50ModelC-Crosser
2009Model year2009
EstateBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Volvo V50SpecificationCitroen C-Crosser
9,0 s0–100 km/h10,4 s
0 km/hTop speed190 km/h
2435 ccEngine displacement2359 cc
170 HPPower170 HP
230 NmTorque232 Nm
5Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo V50SpecificationCitroen C-Crosser
PetrolFuel typePetrol
62 ltFuel tank60 lt
13,2 ltUrban consumption12,6 lt
6,7 ltExtra-urban consumption7,6 lt
9,1 ltAverage consumption9,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Volvo V50SpecificationCitroen C-Crosser
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears6
—Tyre size215/70 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volvo V50SpecificationCitroen C-Crosser
4522 mmLength4646 mm
1845 mmWidth1806 mm
1457 mmHeight1715 mm
1483 KgWeight1650 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2670 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2009 Volvo V50 and 2009 Citroen C-Crosser approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Citroen C-Crosser leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…