DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2008 Volvo V50 vs 2008 Citroen C5 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo V50

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo V50SpecificationCitroen C5
VolvoMakeCitroen
V50ModelC5
2008Model year2008
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Volvo V50SpecificationCitroen C5
9,0 s0–100 km/h10,3 s
200 km/hTop speed222 km/h
2435 ccEngine displacement2179 cc
170 HPPower170 HP
230 NmTorque370 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo V50SpecificationCitroen C5
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
62 ltFuel tank67 lt
—Urban consumption10,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,6 lt
9,2 ltAverage consumption7,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo V50SpecificationCitroen C5
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
—Tyre size215/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo V50SpecificationCitroen C5
4514 mmLength4745 mm
1770 mmWidth1780 mm
1452 mmHeight1476 mm
1452 KgWeight1608 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2750 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2008 Volvo V50 and 2008 Citroen C5 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo V50 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…