2008 • Volvo
V50
Volvo V50 2.4 D5 (180Hp) 2008Overall Score70.75/100
2008 Volvo V50 vs 2008 Mazda CX-7 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2008 • Mazda
CX-7
Mazda CX-7 2.3 16V turbo 4 WD 6A/T (238) 2008Overall Score71.5/100
WINNER
Mazda CX-7
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
70.75–71.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo V50SpecificationMazda CX-7
VolvoMakeMazda
V50ModelCX-7
2008Model year2008
EstateBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Volvo V50SpecificationMazda CX-7
8,5 s0–100 km/h8,3 s
235 km/hTop speed181 km/h
2400 ccEngine displacement2260 cc
180 HPPower238 HP
350 NmTorque350 Nm
5Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo V50SpecificationMazda CX-7
DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank69 lt
9,7 ltUrban consumption15,3 lt
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption9,3 lt
7,0 ltAverage consumption11,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Volvo V50SpecificationMazda CX-7
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears6
205/55 R16Tyre size235/60 R18
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volvo V50SpecificationMazda CX-7
4522 mmLength4675 mm
1845 mmWidth1872 mm
1457 mmHeight1645 mm
1536 KgWeight1802 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2750 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2008 Volvo V50 and 2008 Mazda CX-7 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda CX-7 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…