DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Volvo V50 vs 2009 Great Wall Hover CUV Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Great Wall Hover CUV

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeGreat Wall
V50ModelHover CUV
2009Model year2009
EstateBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

10,7 s0–100 km/h12,0 s
0 km/hTop speed170 km/h
2435 ccEngine displacement2351 cc
140 HPPower130 HP
220 NmTorque192 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
62 ltFuel tank74 lt
13,2 ltUrban consumption14 lt
6,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,1 ltAverage consumption10 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
—Tyre size235/65 R17
YesABS—

Dimensions

4522 mmLength4620 mm
1845 mmWidth1800 mm
1457 mmHeight1775 mm
1335 KgWeight1830 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Volvo V50 and 2009 Great Wall Hover CUV approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Great Wall Hover CUV leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…