2004 • Volvo
V50
Volvo V50 2.4 (140 Hp) 2004Overall Score53.5/100
2004 Volvo V50 vs 2004 Buick Regal Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2004 • Buick
Regal
Buick Regal 2.2 (124 Hp) 2004Overall Score54.25/100
WINNER
Buick Regal
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
53.5–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo V50SpecificationBuick Regal
VolvoMakeBuick
V50ModelRegal
2004Model year2004
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Volvo V50SpecificationBuick Regal
10,7 s0–100 km/h12,3 s
0 km/hTop speed170 km/h
2435 ccEngine displacement2190 cc
140 HPPower124 HP
220 NmTorque180 Nm
5Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo V50SpecificationBuick Regal
PetrolFuel typePetrol
62 ltFuel tank72 lt
13,2 ltUrban consumption—
6,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,1 ltAverage consumption6,7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Volvo V50SpecificationBuick Regal
4522 mmLength4923 mm
1845 mmWidth1845 mm
1457 mmHeight1465 mm
1335 KgWeight—
2640 mmWheelbase2769 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2004 Volvo V50 and 2004 Buick Regal approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Buick Regal leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSChrysler Grand Voyager vs Volvo V502004 and 2004 model years
VSChrysler Voyager vs Volvo V502004 and 2004 model years
VSMitsubishi Pajero vs Volvo V502004 and 2004 model yearsImage unavailableVSGAZ 31 vs Volvo V502004 and 2004 model yearsImage unavailableVSSsangYong Musso vs Volvo V502004 and 2004 model yearsComments are loading…