DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Volvo V50 vs 2004 Mitsubishi Montero Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo V50

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

53.5–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeMitsubishi
V50ModelMontero
2004Model year2004
EstateBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

10,7 s0–100 km/h18,5 s
0 km/hTop speed150 km/h
2435 ccEngine displacement2477 cc
140 HPPower115 HP
220 NmTorque240 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
62 ltFuel tank74 lt
13,2 ltUrban consumption13,1 lt
6,7 ltExtra-urban consumption9 lt
9,1 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
—Tyre size245/70 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4522 mmLength4610 mm
1845 mmWidth1775 mm
1457 mmHeight1735 mm
1335 KgWeight1920 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2725 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Volvo V50 and 2004 Mitsubishi Montero approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo V50 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…