2004 • Volvo
V50
Volvo V50 2.4 (140 Hp) 2004Overall Score53.5/100
2004 Volvo V50 vs 2009 Isuzu D-Max Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2009 • Isuzu
D-Max
Isuzu D-Max 2.5 TD Double Cab (136HP) 2009Overall Score54.25/100
WINNER
Isuzu D-Max
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
53.5–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo V50SpecificationIsuzu D-Max
VolvoMakeIsuzu
V50ModelD-Max
2004Model year2009
EstateBody typePick-up
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Volvo V50SpecificationIsuzu D-Max
10,7 s0–100 km/h25,7 s
0 km/hTop speed150 km/h
2435 ccEngine displacement2499 cc
140 HPPower136 HP
220 NmTorque280 Nm
5Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo V50SpecificationIsuzu D-Max
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
62 ltFuel tank76 lt
13,2 ltUrban consumption9,8 lt
6,7 ltExtra-urban consumption7,1 lt
9,1 ltAverage consumption8,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Volvo V50SpecificationIsuzu D-Max
4522 mmLength5035 mm
1845 mmWidth1800 mm
1457 mmHeight1735 mm
1335 KgWeight—
2640 mmWheelbase3050 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2004 Volvo V50 and 2009 Isuzu D-Max approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Isuzu D-Max leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSChrysler Grand Voyager vs Volvo V502004 and 2004 model years
VSChrysler Voyager vs Volvo V502004 and 2004 model years
VSMitsubishi Pajero vs Volvo V502004 and 2004 model yearsImage unavailableVSGAZ 31 vs Volvo V502004 and 2004 model yearsImage unavailableVSSsangYong Musso vs Volvo V502004 and 2004 model yearsComments are loading…