2012 • Volvo
V50
Volvo V50 2.0 F (145 Hp) 2012Overall Score56.5/100
2012 Volvo V50 vs 2012 Great Wall Hover CUV Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2012 • Great Wall
Hover CUV
Great Wall Hover CUV Hover 2.4 i (130 Hp) 2012Overall Score57.25/100
WINNER
Great Wall Hover CUV
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo V50SpecificationGreat Wall Hover CUV
VolvoMakeGreat Wall
V50ModelHover CUV
2012Model year2012
EstateBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Volvo V50SpecificationGreat Wall Hover CUV
9,6 s0–100 km/h12,0 s
0 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1999 ccEngine displacement2351 cc
145 HPPower130 HP
185 NmTorque192 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo V50SpecificationGreat Wall Hover CUV
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank74 lt
10,2 ltUrban consumption14 lt
5,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,4 ltAverage consumption10 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Volvo V50SpecificationGreat Wall Hover CUV
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
—Tyre size235/65 R17
YesABS—
Dimensions
Volvo V50SpecificationGreat Wall Hover CUV
4522 mmLength4620 mm
1845 mmWidth1800 mm
1457 mmHeight1775 mm
1381 KgWeight1830 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2700 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 Volvo V50 and 2012 Great Wall Hover CUV approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Great Wall Hover CUV leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…