2012 • Volvo
V50
Volvo V50 2.0 F (145 Hp) 2012Overall Score56.5/100
2012 Volvo V50 vs 2012 Chevrolet Orlando Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2012 • Chevrolet
Orlando
Chevrolet Orlando 1.8 (141 Hp) 2012Overall Score57.25/100
WINNER
Chevrolet Orlando
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo V50SpecificationChevrolet Orlando
VolvoMakeChevrolet
V50ModelOrlando
2012Model year2012
EstateBody typeMPV
5Seats7
5Doors5
Performance
Volvo V50SpecificationChevrolet Orlando
9,6 s0–100 km/h11,8 s
0 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1999 ccEngine displacement1796 cc
145 HPPower141 HP
185 NmTorque176 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo V50SpecificationChevrolet Orlando
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank64 lt
10,2 ltUrban consumption11 lt
5,7 ltExtra-urban consumption6,1 lt
7,4 ltAverage consumption7,9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Volvo V50SpecificationChevrolet Orlando
4522 mmLength4652 mm
1845 mmWidth1836 mm
1457 mmHeight1633 mm
1381 KgWeight1539 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2760 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 Volvo V50 and 2012 Chevrolet Orlando approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Chevrolet Orlando leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…