2009 • Volvo
V50
Volvo V50 2.0 F (145 Hp) 2009Overall Score56.5/100
2009 Volvo V50 vs 2009 Volkswagen Caddy Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2009 • Volkswagen
Caddy
Volkswagen Caddy 2.0 ecoFuel (109 Hp) 2009Overall Score57.25/100
WINNER
Volkswagen Caddy
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo V50SpecificationVolkswagen Caddy
VolvoMakeVolkswagen
V50ModelCaddy
2009Model year2009
EstateBody typeMinivan
5Seats5/7
5Doors5
Performance
Volvo V50SpecificationVolkswagen Caddy
9,6 s0–100 km/h13,8 s
0 km/hTop speed169 km/h
1999 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
145 HPPower109 HP
185 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo V50SpecificationVolkswagen Caddy
PetrolFuel typePetrol / CNG
55 ltFuel tank13 lt
10,2 ltUrban consumption8,2 lt
5,7 ltExtra-urban consumption4,7 lt
7,4 ltAverage consumption6,0 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Volvo V50SpecificationVolkswagen Caddy
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volvo V50SpecificationVolkswagen Caddy
4522 mmLength4405 mm
1845 mmWidth1802 mm
1457 mmHeight1833 mm
1381 KgWeight1627-1726 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2682 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2009 Volvo V50 and 2009 Volkswagen Caddy approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volkswagen Caddy leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…