DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Volvo V50 vs 2010 Mazda 3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

61.75–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo V50SpecificationMazda 3
VolvoMakeMazda
V50Model3
2010Model year2010
EstateBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Volvo V50SpecificationMazda 3
9,6 s0–100 km/h10,4 s
0 km/hTop speed206 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1999 cc
136 HPPower151 HP
320 NmTorque191 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo V50SpecificationMazda 3
DieselFuel typePetrol
52 ltFuel tank55 lt
7,6 ltUrban consumption9,3 lt
4,6 ltExtra-urban consumption5,4 lt
5,7 ltAverage consumption6,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo V50SpecificationMazda 3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size205/50 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo V50SpecificationMazda 3
4522 mmLength4460 mm
1845 mmWidth1755 mm
1457 mmHeight1470 mm
1472 KgWeight1270 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Volvo V50 and 2010 Mazda 3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…