DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Volvo V50 vs 2011 Fiat Freemont Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Fiat Freemont

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

61.75–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeFiat
V50ModelFreemont
2010Model year2011
EstateBody typeSUV
5Seats7
5Doors5

Performance

9,6 s0–100 km/h12,3 s
0 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1956 cc
136 HPPower140 HP
320 NmTorque350 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
52 ltFuel tank77 lt
7,6 ltUrban consumption8,3 lt
4,6 ltExtra-urban consumption5,3 lt
5,7 ltAverage consumption6,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size225/65 R17; 225/55 R19
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4522 mmLength4910 mm
1845 mmWidth1878 mm
1457 mmHeight1705 mm
1472 KgWeight1949 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2890 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Volvo V50 and 2011 Fiat Freemont approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Fiat Freemont leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…