DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Volvo V50 vs 2009 Renault Scenic Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Scenic

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

61.75–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeRenault
V50ModelScenic
2009Model year2009
EstateBody typeMinivan
5Seats7
5Doors5

Performance

9,6 s0–100 km/h11,5 s
0 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1870 cc
136 HPPower130 HP
320 NmTorque300 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
52 ltFuel tank60 lt
7,6 ltUrban consumption6,8 lt
4,6 ltExtra-urban consumption5,0 lt
5,7 ltAverage consumption5,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size205/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4522 mmLength4560 mm
1845 mmWidth1845 mm
1457 mmHeight1645 mm
1472 KgWeight1540 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2770 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Volvo V50 and 2009 Renault Scenic approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Scenic leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…