DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Volvo V50 vs 2006 Citroen C8 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Citroen C8

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

61.75–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo V50SpecificationCitroen C8
VolvoMakeCitroen
V50ModelC8
2006Model year2006
EstateBody typeMinivan, MPV
5Seats7
5Doors5

Performance

Volvo V50SpecificationCitroen C8
9,6 s0–100 km/h13,6 s
0 km/hTop speed182 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement2179 cc
136 HPPower128 HP
320 NmTorque314 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo V50SpecificationCitroen C8
DieselFuel typeDiesel
52 ltFuel tank80 lt
7,6 ltUrban consumption10,1 lt
4,6 ltExtra-urban consumption5,9 lt
5,7 ltAverage consumption7,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo V50SpecificationCitroen C8
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
—Tyre size215/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo V50SpecificationCitroen C8
4522 mmLength4727 mm
1845 mmWidth1854 mm
1457 mmHeight1766-1856 mm
1472 KgWeight1750 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2823 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Volvo V50 and 2006 Citroen C8 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Citroen C8 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…