DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2007 Volvo V50 vs 2007 Saab 9-3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Saab 9-3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo V50SpecificationSaab 9-3
VolvoMakeSaab
V50Model9-3
2007Model year2007
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Volvo V50SpecificationSaab 9-3
9,6 s0–100 km/h9,5 s
210 km/hTop speed210 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
136 HPPower150 HP
320 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo V50SpecificationSaab 9-3
DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank62 lt
—Urban consumption11,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,1 lt
5,7 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo V50SpecificationSaab 9-3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size215/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo V50SpecificationSaab 9-3
4514 mmLength4635 mm
1770 mmWidth1762 mm
1452 mmHeight1466 mm
1456 KgWeight1440 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2675 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2007 Volvo V50 and 2007 Saab 9-3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Saab 9-3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…