2006 • Volvo
V50
Volvo V50 1.6 i 16V (101 Hp) 2006Overall Score57.25/100
2006 Volvo V50 vs 2006 Citroen C3 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2006 • Citroen
C3
Citroen C3 1.6 HDi (90 Hp) 2006Overall Score56.25/100
WINNER
Volvo V50
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
57.25–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo V50SpecificationCitroen C3
VolvoMakeCitroen
V50ModelC3
2006Model year2006
EstateBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Volvo V50SpecificationCitroen C3
12,0 s0–100 km/h12,0 s
185 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1596 ccEngine displacement1560 cc
101 HPPower90 HP
150 NmTorque215 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo V50SpecificationCitroen C3
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
62 ltFuel tank47 lt
9,5 ltUrban consumption5,7 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption3,7 lt
—Average consumption4,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Volvo V50SpecificationCitroen C3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size175/65 R14; 185/60 R15; 195/50 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volvo V50SpecificationCitroen C3
4514 mmLength3860 mm
1770 mmWidth1667 mm
1452 mmHeight1510 mm
1260 KgWeight1088 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2460 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2006 Volvo V50 and 2006 Citroen C3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volvo V50 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…