DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2008 Volvo V50 vs 2008 Mazda 6 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 6

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo V50SpecificationMazda 6
VolvoMakeMazda
V50Model6
2008Model year2008
EstateBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Volvo V50SpecificationMazda 6
11,5 s0–100 km/h11,2 s
0 km/hTop speed192 km/h
1560 ccEngine displacement1798 cc
109 HPPower120 HP
240 NmTorque165 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo V50SpecificationMazda 6
DieselFuel typePetrol
52 ltFuel tank64 lt
5,7 ltUrban consumption11,0 lt
3,8 ltExtra-urban consumption6,1 lt
4,5 ltAverage consumption7,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo V50SpecificationMazda 6
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size195/65 R15 H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo V50SpecificationMazda 6
4522 mmLength4710 mm
1845 mmWidth1780 mm
1457 mmHeight1480 mm
1416 KgWeight1360 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2675 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2008 Volvo V50 and 2008 Mazda 6 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 6 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…