DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2008 Volvo V50 vs 2008 Citroen C3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Citroen C3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo V50SpecificationCitroen C3
VolvoMakeCitroen
V50ModelC3
2008Model year2008
EstateBody typeKombi, MPV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Volvo V50SpecificationCitroen C3
11,5 s0–100 km/h12,1 s
0 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1560 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
109 HPPower115 HP
240 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo V50SpecificationCitroen C3
DieselFuel typePetrol
52 ltFuel tank50 lt
5,7 ltUrban consumption9 lt
3,8 ltExtra-urban consumption4,9 lt
4,5 ltAverage consumption6,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo V50SpecificationCitroen C3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size195/55 R16; 205/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo V50SpecificationCitroen C3
4522 mmLength4078 mm
1845 mmWidth1766 mm
1457 mmHeight1669-1672 mm
1416 KgWeight1290 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2540 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2008 Volvo V50 and 2008 Citroen C3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Citroen C3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…