DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Volvo V50 vs 2006 Renault Scenic Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Scenic

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeRenault
V50ModelScenic
2006Model year2006
EstateBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

11,5 s0–100 km/h11,8 s
0 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1560 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
109 HPPower115 HP
240 NmTorque152 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
52 ltFuel tank60 lt
5,7 ltUrban consumption10,3 lt
3,8 ltExtra-urban consumption6,3 lt
4,5 ltAverage consumption7,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

4522 mmLength4259 mm
1845 mmWidth1810 mm
1457 mmHeight1620 mm
1416 KgWeight—
2640 mmWheelbase2685 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Volvo V50 and 2006 Renault Scenic approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Scenic leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…