DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Volvo V50 vs 2006 Mazda 3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo V50

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

56.5–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo V50SpecificationMazda 3
VolvoMakeMazda
V50Model3
2006Model year2006
EstateBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Volvo V50SpecificationMazda 3
11,5 s0–100 km/h12,2 s
0 km/hTop speed174 km/h
1560 ccEngine displacement1560 cc
109 HPPower90 HP
240 NmTorque215 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo V50SpecificationMazda 3
DieselFuel typeDiesel
52 ltFuel tank55 lt
5,7 ltUrban consumption6,0 lt
3,8 ltExtra-urban consumption4,0 lt
4,5 ltAverage consumption4,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo V50SpecificationMazda 3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo V50SpecificationMazda 3
4522 mmLength4415 mm
1845 mmWidth1755 mm
1457 mmHeight1465 mm
1416 KgWeight1270 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Volvo V50 and 2006 Mazda 3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo V50 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…