DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Volvo V50 vs 2006 Volkswagen Fox Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo V50

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

53.5–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeVolkswagen
V50ModelFox
2006Model year2006
EstateBody typeHatchback
5Seats4
5Doors3

Performance

12,0 s0–100 km/h14,7 s
0 km/hTop speed161 km/h
1596 ccEngine displacement1422 cc
100 HPPower70 HP
150 NmTorque155 Nm
4Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank50 lt
9,2 ltUrban consumption6,1 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption4,2 lt
7,1 ltAverage consumption4,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size185/60 R14 H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4522 mmLength3828 mm
1845 mmWidth1660 mm
1457 mmHeight1544 mm
1335 KgWeight1085 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2465 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Volvo V50 and 2006 Volkswagen Fox approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo V50 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…