DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Volvo V50 vs 2006 Citroen C4 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Citroen C4

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

53.5–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo V50SpecificationCitroen C4
VolvoMakeCitroen
V50ModelC4
2006Model year2006
EstateBody typeCoupe
5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

Volvo V50SpecificationCitroen C4
12,0 s0–100 km/h11,9 s
0 km/hTop speed194 km/h
1596 ccEngine displacement1587 cc
100 HPPower109 HP
150 NmTorque147 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo V50SpecificationCitroen C4
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank60 lt
9,2 ltUrban consumption9,5 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption5,7 lt
7,1 ltAverage consumption7,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo V50SpecificationCitroen C4
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo V50SpecificationCitroen C4
4522 mmLength4273 mm
1845 mmWidth1769 mm
1457 mmHeight1456 mm
1335 KgWeight1200 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2608 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Volvo V50 and 2006 Citroen C4 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Citroen C4 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…