DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Volvo V40 vs 2016 BMW 4 Serisi Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo V40

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

75.75–75.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeBMW
V40Model4 Serisi
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeCabriolet
5Seats4
5Doors2

Performance

6,9 s0–100 km/h8,2 s
230 km/hTop speed230 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
213 HPPower184 HP
300 NmTorque270 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
62 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption8,0 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,1 lt
7,5 ltAverage consumption6,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size225/50 R17 94W; 225/45 R18; 255/40 R18; 225/40 R19; 255/35 R19
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4369 mmLength4638 mm
1857 mmWidth1825 mm
1439 mmHeight1384 mm
—Weight1700 Kg
2647 mmWheelbase2810 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Volvo V40 and 2016 BMW 4 Serisi approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo V40 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…