DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Volvo V40 vs 2016 Fiat Toro Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Fiat Toro

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

75.75–76.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo V40SpecificationFiat Toro
VolvoMakeFiat
V40ModelToro
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typePick-up
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Volvo V40SpecificationFiat Toro
6,9 s0–100 km/h—
230 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1956 cc
213 HPPower170 HP
300 NmTorque350 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo V40SpecificationFiat Toro
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
62 ltFuel tank60 lt
7,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo V40SpecificationFiat Toro
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size225/70 R16; 225/65 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo V40SpecificationFiat Toro
4369 mmLength4915 mm
1857 mmWidth1844 mm
1439 mmHeight1746 mm
—Weight1709 Kg
2647 mmWheelbase2990 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Volvo V40 and 2016 Fiat Toro approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Fiat Toro leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…