DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2015 Volvo V40 vs 2015 Mitsubishi ASX Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi ASX

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

70.5–71.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeMitsubishi
V40ModelASX
2015Model year2015
HatchbackBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

8,3 s0–100 km/h—
210 km/hTop speed194 km/h
1969 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
152 HPPower150 HP
250 NmTorque197 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
62 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption10,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,3 lt
5,5 ltAverage consumption7,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
—Tyre size215/65 R16; 215/60 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4369 mmLength4295 mm
1857 mmWidth1770 mm
1439 mmHeight1625 mm
—Weight1360 Kg
2647 mmWheelbase2670 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2015 Volvo V40 and 2015 Mitsubishi ASX approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi ASX leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…