2013 • Volvo
V40
Volvo V40 2.0 D4 (177 Hp) 2013Overall Score73.75/100
2013 Volvo V40 vs 2013 SsangYong Rexton Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2013 • SsangYong
Rexton
SsangYong Rexton 2013Overall Score74.5/100
WINNER
SsangYong Rexton
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
73.75–74.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo V40SpecificationSsangYong Rexton
VolvoMakeSsangYong
V40ModelRexton
2013Model year2013
HatchbackBody typeSUV
5Seats5/7
5Doors5
Performance
Volvo V40SpecificationSsangYong Rexton
8,3 s0–100 km/h—
215 km/hTop speed173 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
177 HPPower155 HP
400 NmTorque360 Nm
5Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo V40SpecificationSsangYong Rexton
DieselFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank78 lt
—Urban consumption9,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,1 lt
5,3 ltAverage consumption7,3 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Volvo V40SpecificationSsangYong Rexton
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
205/55 R16Tyre size235/75 R16; 255/60 R18
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volvo V40SpecificationSsangYong Rexton
4369 mmLength4755 mm
1802 mmWidth1900 mm
1445 mmHeight1785-1840 mm
1398 KgWeight1901-1965 Kg
2647 mmWheelbase2835 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2013 Volvo V40 and 2013 SsangYong Rexton approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, SsangYong Rexton leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…