DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2015 Volvo V40 vs 2015 SsangYong Rexton Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo V40

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

72.75–72.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeSsangYong
V40ModelRexton
2015Model year2015
HatchbackBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

9,3 s0–100 km/h13,4 s
205 km/hTop speed175 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
150 HPPower155 HP
350 NmTorque360 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank78 lt
—Urban consumption9,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,5 lt
5,3 ltAverage consumption8,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x2
6Gears6
—TransmissionAutomatic
205/55 R16Tyre size18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4369 mmLength4755 mm
1802 mmWidth1900 mm
1445 mmHeight1840 mm
1398 KgWeight1925 kg
—Luggage capacity250 lt
2647 mmWheelbase—

Additional Features

Volvo V40

No additional feature records are available.

SsangYong RextonDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagABSEBDESPASRCruise ControlTrip ComputerArmrestPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsLeather Steering WheelDigital Climate ControlIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsRear Parking SensorsAuto-dimming Rear-view MirrorFolding MirrorsUSB PortBluetooth

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2015 Volvo V40 and 2015 SsangYong Rexton approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo V40 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…