DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Volvo V40 vs 2003 Volvo S40 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo V40

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo V40SpecificationVolvo S40
VolvoMakeVolvo
V40ModelS40
2003Model year2003
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Volvo V40SpecificationVolvo S40
10,5 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
195 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1870 ccEngine displacement1834 cc
115 HPPower122 HP
265 NmTorque174 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo V40SpecificationVolvo S40
DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
7,3 ltUrban consumption9,1 lt
4,5 ltExtra-urban consumption5,7 lt
6,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo V40SpecificationVolvo S40
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/60 R15; 205/50 R16Tyre size185/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo V40SpecificationVolvo S40
4516 mmLength4516 mm
1716 mmWidth1716 mm
1425 mmHeight1422 mm
1320 KgWeight1230 Kg
2562 mmWheelbase2562 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Volvo V40 and 2003 Volvo S40 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo V40 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…