DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Volvo V40 vs 2003 Saturn SW Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Saturn SW

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo V40SpecificationSaturn SW
VolvoMakeSaturn
V40ModelSW
2003Model year2003
EstateBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Volvo V40SpecificationSaturn SW
10,5 s0–100 km/h9,0 s
200 km/hTop speed160 km/h
1834 ccEngine displacement1901 cc
122 HPPower126 HP
174 NmTorque165 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo V40SpecificationSaturn SW
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank46 lt
9,1 ltUrban consumption8,7 lt
5,7 ltExtra-urban consumption6,2 lt
—Average consumption7,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo V40SpecificationSaturn SW
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R15Tyre size185/65 R15 T
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo V40SpecificationSaturn SW
4516 mmLength4524 mm
1716 mmWidth1687 mm
1425 mmHeight1412 mm
1260 KgWeight1112 Kg
2562 mmWheelbase2601 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Volvo V40 and 2003 Saturn SW approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Saturn SW leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…