2003 • Volvo
V40
Volvo V40 1.8 GDI (122 Hp) 2003Overall Score56.5/100
2003 Volvo V40 vs 2003 Alfa Romeo 156 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Alfa Romeo
156
Alfa Romeo 156 1.9 JTD (105 Hp) 2003Overall Score57.25/100
WINNER
Alfa Romeo 156
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo V40SpecificationAlfa Romeo 156
VolvoMakeAlfa Romeo
V40Model156
2003Model year2003
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Volvo V40SpecificationAlfa Romeo 156
10,5 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
200 km/hTop speed188 km/h
1834 ccEngine displacement1910 cc
122 HPPower105 HP
174 NmTorque255 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo V40SpecificationAlfa Romeo 156
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank63 lt
9,1 ltUrban consumption7,8 lt
5,7 ltExtra-urban consumption4,7 lt
—Average consumption5,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Volvo V40SpecificationAlfa Romeo 156
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R15Tyre size185/65 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volvo V40SpecificationAlfa Romeo 156
4516 mmLength4430 mm
1716 mmWidth1745 mm
1425 mmHeight1415 mm
1260 KgWeight1270 Kg
2562 mmWheelbase2595 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Volvo V40 and 2003 Alfa Romeo 156 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Alfa Romeo 156 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…