DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Volvo V40 vs 2000 Rover MGF Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover MGF

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo V40SpecificationRover MGF
VolvoMakeRover
V40ModelMGF
2000Model year2000
EstateBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2
5Doors2

Performance

Volvo V40SpecificationRover MGF
10,5 s0–100 km/h9,2 s
200 km/hTop speed193 km/h
1834 ccEngine displacement1796 cc
122 HPPower120 HP
174 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo V40SpecificationRover MGF
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank50 lt
9,1 ltUrban consumption—
5,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption6,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo V40SpecificationRover MGF
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R15Tyre size185/55 VR15; 205/50 VR15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo V40SpecificationRover MGF
4516 mmLength3913 mm
1716 mmWidth1628 mm
1425 mmHeight1464 mm
1260 KgWeight1060 Kg
2562 mmWheelbase2375 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Volvo V40 and 2000 Rover MGF approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover MGF leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…