DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 Volvo V40 vs 1995 Alfa Romeo 146 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo V40

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

53.25–52.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeAlfa Romeo
V40Model146
1995Model year1995
EstateBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

10,5 s0–100 km/h10,2 s
195 km/hTop speed202 km/h
1731 ccEngine displacement1712 cc
115 HPPower129 HP
165 NmTorque148 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank51 lt
10 ltUrban consumption—
7,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
8,1 ltAverage consumption8,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/55 R15Tyre size185/60 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4480 mmLength4257 mm
1720 mmWidth1712 mm
1410 mmHeight1425 mm
1303 KgWeight1225 Kg
2550 mmWheelbase2540 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 Volvo V40 and 1995 Alfa Romeo 146 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo V40 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…