2015 • Volvo
V40
Volvo V40 1.6 T2 (120 Hp) 2015Overall Score61.5/100
2015 Volvo V40 vs 2015 Ford C-Max Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2015 • Ford
C-Max
Ford C-Max 1.6 TDCi (115 Hp) 2015Overall Score62.25/100
WINNER
Ford C-Max
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
61.5–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo V40SpecificationFord C-Max
VolvoMakeFord
V40ModelC-Max
2015Model year2015
HatchbackBody typeMPV
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Volvo V40SpecificationFord C-Max
9,9 s0–100 km/h11,3 s
0 km/hTop speed184 km/h
1596 ccEngine displacement1560 cc
120 HPPower115 HP
240 NmTorque215 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo V40SpecificationFord C-Max
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
62 ltFuel tank55 lt
6,8 ltUrban consumption5,4 lt
4,5 ltExtra-urban consumption4,0 lt
5,3 ltAverage consumption4,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Volvo V40SpecificationFord C-Max
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size205/55 R16; 215/55 R16; 215/50 R17; 235/40 R18
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volvo V40SpecificationFord C-Max
4369 mmLength4379 mm
1783 mmWidth1828 mm
1420 mmHeight1626 mm
1463 KgWeight1390 Kg
2647 mmWheelbase—
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2015 Volvo V40 and 2015 Ford C-Max approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford C-Max leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…