2014 • Volvo
V40
Volvo V40 1.6 T2 (120 Hp) 2014Overall Score59.5/100
2014 Volvo V40 vs 2015 Mini Paceman Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2015 • Mini
Paceman
Mini Paceman 1.6 (122 Hp) 2015Overall Score59.25/100
WINNER
Volvo V40
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
59.5–59.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo V40SpecificationMini Paceman
VolvoMakeMini
V40ModelPaceman
2014Model year2015
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats4
5Doors3
Performance
Volvo V40SpecificationMini Paceman
9,9 s0–100 km/h10,3 s
0 km/hTop speed193 km/h
1596 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
120 HPPower122 HP
240 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo V40SpecificationMini Paceman
PetrolFuel typePetrol
62 ltFuel tank47 lt
6,8 ltUrban consumption7,3 lt
4,5 ltExtra-urban consumption5,1 lt
5,3 ltAverage consumption5,9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Volvo V40SpecificationMini Paceman
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size205/60 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volvo V40SpecificationMini Paceman
4369 mmLength4109 mm
1783 mmWidth1786 mm
1420 mmHeight1518 mm
1463 KgWeight1255 Kg
2647 mmWheelbase2595 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2014 Volvo V40 and 2015 Mini Paceman approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volvo V40 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…