2003 • Volvo
V40
Volvo V40 1.6 16V (109 Hp) 2003Overall Score51.25/100
2003 Volvo V40 vs 2003 Mitsubishi Lancer Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Mitsubishi
Lancer
Mitsubishi Lancer 1.6 i 16V (98 Hp) 2003Overall Score50.25/100
WINNER
Volvo V40
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
51.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo V40SpecificationMitsubishi Lancer
VolvoMakeMitsubishi
V40ModelLancer
2003Model year2003
EstateBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Volvo V40SpecificationMitsubishi Lancer
12,0 s0–100 km/h12,6 s
190 km/hTop speed181 km/h
1587 ccEngine displacement1584 cc
109 HPPower98 HP
145 NmTorque150 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo V40SpecificationMitsubishi Lancer
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank50 lt
11,1 ltUrban consumption8,9 lt
6 ltExtra-urban consumption5,8 lt
—Average consumption7,0 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Volvo V40SpecificationMitsubishi Lancer
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/55 R15Tyre size195/60 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volvo V40SpecificationMitsubishi Lancer
4516 mmLength4485 mm
1716 mmWidth1695 mm
1425 mmHeight1480 mm
1280 KgWeight1360 Kg
2562 mmWheelbase2600 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Volvo V40 and 2003 Mitsubishi Lancer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volvo V40 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…