DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2001 Volvo V40 vs 2001 Volkswagen Polo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo V40

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

51.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeVolkswagen
V40ModelPolo
2001Model year2001
EstateBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3/5

Performance

12,0 s0–100 km/h13,6 s
190 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1587 ccEngine displacement1422 cc
109 HPPower80 HP
145 NmTorque195 Nm
4Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank45 lt
11,1 ltUrban consumption5,5 lt
6 ltExtra-urban consumption3,9 lt
—Average consumption4,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/55 R15Tyre size185/60 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4516 mmLength3743 mm
1716 mmWidth1632 mm
1425 mmHeight1418 mm
1280 KgWeight1035 Kg
2562 mmWheelbase2407 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2001 Volvo V40 and 2001 Volkswagen Polo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo V40 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…