DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Volvo S90 vs 2014 Kia Optima Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Optima

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

77.75–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo S90SpecificationKia Optima
VolvoMakeKia
S90ModelOptima
2017Model year2014
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Volvo S90SpecificationKia Optima
5,8 s0–100 km/h—
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1969 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
320 HPPower278 HP
400 NmTorque365 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo S90SpecificationKia Optima
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank70 lt
7,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo S90SpecificationKia Optima
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size225/45 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo S90SpecificationKia Optima
4963 mmLength4845 mm
1879 mmWidth1830 mm
1443 mmHeight1455 mm
—Weight1573 Kg
2941 mmWheelbase2795 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Volvo S90 and 2014 Kia Optima approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Optima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…