2010 • Volvo
S80
Volvo S80 2.4 D5 (205 Hp) 2010Overall Score70.75/100
2010 Volvo S80 vs 2010 Mazda CX-7 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2010 • Mazda
CX-7
Mazda CX-7 2.3 16V turbo 4 WD 6A/T (238) 2010Overall Score71.5/100
WINNER
Mazda CX-7
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
70.75–71.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo S80SpecificationMazda CX-7
VolvoMakeMazda
S80ModelCX-7
2010Model year2010
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Volvo S80SpecificationMazda CX-7
8,5 s0–100 km/h8,3 s
0 km/hTop speed181 km/h
2400 ccEngine displacement2260 cc
205 HPPower238 HP
420 NmTorque350 Nm
5Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo S80SpecificationMazda CX-7
DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank69 lt
9,0 ltUrban consumption15,3 lt
5,0 ltExtra-urban consumption9,3 lt
6,7 ltAverage consumption11,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Volvo S80SpecificationMazda CX-7
4851 mmLength4675 mm
1861 mmWidth1872 mm
1493 mmHeight1645 mm
1647 KgWeight1802 Kg
2835 mmWheelbase2750 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2010 Volvo S80 and 2010 Mazda CX-7 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda CX-7 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…