2009 • Volvo
S80
Volvo S80 2.4 D (175 Hp) 2009Overall Score67.75/100
2009 Volvo S80 vs 2009 Mazda Tribute Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2009 • Mazda
Tribute
Mazda Tribute 2.5i (171 Hp) 2009Overall Score68.5/100
WINNER
Mazda Tribute
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo S80SpecificationMazda Tribute
VolvoMakeMazda
S80ModelTribute
2009Model year2009
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Volvo S80SpecificationMazda Tribute
9,5 s0–100 km/h—
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2400 ccEngine displacement2488 cc
175 HPPower171 HP
420 NmTorque232 Nm
5Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo S80SpecificationMazda Tribute
DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank66 lt
9,2 ltUrban consumption10,2 lt
5,1 ltExtra-urban consumption8,4 lt
6,6 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Volvo S80SpecificationMazda Tribute
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
—Tyre size235/70 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volvo S80SpecificationMazda Tribute
4851 mmLength4442 mm
1861 mmWidth—
1493 mmHeight1783 mm
1647 KgWeight1484 Kg
2835 mmWheelbase2619 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2009 Volvo S80 and 2009 Mazda Tribute approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda Tribute leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…