2012 • Volvo
S80
Volvo S80 1.6 T4F (180 Hp) 2012Overall Score62.5/100
2012 Volvo S80 vs 2012 Mazda CX-5 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2012 • Mazda
CX-5
Mazda CX-5 2.0 (160 Hp) 2012Overall Score63.25/100
WINNER
Mazda CX-5
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo S80SpecificationMazda CX-5
VolvoMakeMazda
S80ModelCX-5
2012Model year2012
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Volvo S80SpecificationMazda CX-5
8,5 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
0 km/hTop speed197 km/h
1596 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
180 HPPower160 HP
240 NmTorque208 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo S80SpecificationMazda CX-5
Petrol / Ethanol – E85Fuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank58 lt
9,5 ltUrban consumption8,1 lt
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption5,8 lt
6,9 ltAverage consumption6,6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Volvo S80SpecificationMazda CX-5
4851 mmLength4555 mm
1861 mmWidth1840 mm
1493 mmHeight1710 mm
1570 KgWeight1488 Kg
2835 mmWheelbase2700 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 Volvo S80 and 2012 Mazda CX-5 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda CX-5 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…