DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Volvo S80 vs 2010 Citroen C3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Citroen C3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo S80SpecificationCitroen C3
VolvoMakeCitroen
S80ModelC3
2010Model year2010
SedanBody typeKombi, MPV
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

Volvo S80SpecificationCitroen C3
13,0 s0–100 km/h12,1 s
0 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1560 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
109 HPPower115 HP
240 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo S80SpecificationCitroen C3
DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank50 lt
—Urban consumption9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,9 lt
4,9 ltAverage consumption6,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo S80SpecificationCitroen C3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size195/55 R16; 205/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo S80SpecificationCitroen C3
4851 mmLength4078 mm
1861 mmWidth1766 mm
1493 mmHeight1669-1672 mm
1630 KgWeight1290 Kg
2835 mmWheelbase2540 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Volvo S80 and 2010 Citroen C3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Citroen C3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…