DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Volvo S80 vs 2009 Mazda 3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo S80

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

56.5–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo S80SpecificationMazda 3
VolvoMakeMazda
S80Model3
2009Model year2009
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

Volvo S80SpecificationMazda 3
13,0 s0–100 km/h12,2 s
0 km/hTop speed174 km/h
1560 ccEngine displacement1560 cc
109 HPPower90 HP
240 NmTorque215 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo S80SpecificationMazda 3
DieselFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption6,0 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,0 lt
4,9 ltAverage consumption4,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo S80SpecificationMazda 3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo S80SpecificationMazda 3
4851 mmLength4415 mm
1861 mmWidth1755 mm
1493 mmHeight1465 mm
1630 KgWeight1270 Kg
2835 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Volvo S80 and 2009 Mazda 3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo S80 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…