DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Volvo S80 vs 2009 Citroen C3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Citroen C3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo S80SpecificationCitroen C3
VolvoMakeCitroen
S80ModelC3
2009Model year2009
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

Volvo S80SpecificationCitroen C3
13,0 s0–100 km/h10,0 s
0 km/hTop speed192 km/h
1560 ccEngine displacement1587 cc
109 HPPower109 HP
240 NmTorque147 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo S80SpecificationCitroen C3
DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank47 lt
—Urban consumption8,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,2 lt
4,9 ltAverage consumption6,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo S80SpecificationCitroen C3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size175/65 R14; 185/60 R15; 195/50 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Volvo S80SpecificationCitroen C3
4851 mmLength3860 mm
1861 mmWidth1667 mm
1493 mmHeight1510 mm
1630 KgWeight1084 Kg
2835 mmWheelbase2460 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Volvo S80 and 2009 Citroen C3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Citroen C3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…