2000 • Volvo
S60
Volvo S60 2.4 D5 (163 Hp) 2000Overall Score67.75/100
2000 Volvo S60 vs 2000 Nissan X-Terra Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Nissan
X-Terra
Nissan X-Terra 2.4 i 16V 2WD (145 Hp) 2000Overall Score68.5/100
WINNER
Nissan X-Terra
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo S60SpecificationNissan X-Terra
VolvoMakeNissan
S60ModelX-Terra
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Volvo S60SpecificationNissan X-Terra
9,5 s0–100 km/h—
210 km/hTop speed165 km/h
2401 ccEngine displacement2389 cc
163 HPPower145 HP
340 NmTorque309 Nm
5Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo S60SpecificationNissan X-Terra
DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank60 lt
8,7 ltUrban consumption12,4 lt
5,2 ltExtra-urban consumption9,8 lt
6,5 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Volvo S60SpecificationNissan X-Terra
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/55 R16Tyre size235/70 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volvo S60SpecificationNissan X-Terra
4576 mmLength4522 mm
1804 mmWidth1788 mm
1428 mmHeight1763 mm
1570 KgWeight1620 Kg
2715 mmWheelbase2650 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Volvo S60 and 2000 Nissan X-Terra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Nissan X-Terra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…