DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Volvo S60 vs 2009 Honda S2000 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Honda S2000

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 6 points.

65.5–71.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeHonda
S60ModelS2000
2000Model year2009
SedanBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2
4Doors2

Performance

8,8 s0–100 km/h6,2 s
225 km/hTop speed240 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement2157 cc
180 HPPower242 HP
240 NmTorque221 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank50 lt
12,8 ltUrban consumption13,2 lt
7,1 ltExtra-urban consumption7,9 lt
9,2 ltAverage consumption9,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears6
205/55 R16Tyre sizeFront tyres: 215/45 R17, Rear tyres: 245/40 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4576 mmLength4135 mm
1804 mmWidth1750 mm
1428 mmHeight1285 mm
1533 KgWeight1250 Kg
2715 mmWheelbase2400 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Volvo S60 and 2009 Honda S2000 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Honda S2000 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 6 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…