DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Volvo S60 vs 2013 Chevrolet Captiva Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Captiva

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeChevrolet
S60ModelCaptiva
2013Model year2013
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

9,2 s0–100 km/h—
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement2384 cc
163 HPPower182 HP
400 NmTorque233 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
67 ltFuel tank72 lt
—Urban consumption11,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,4 lt
5,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size235/60 R17; 235/55 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4628 mmLength4575 mm
1865 mmWidth1849 mm
1484 mmHeight1702 mm
1582 KgWeight1724-1732 Kg
2776 mmWheelbase2708 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Volvo S60 and 2013 Chevrolet Captiva approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Captiva leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…